Project
Bering Strait Tunnel
Every few years the same headlines appear: A Moscow conference estimates a tunnel under the Bering Strait would cost $65B. A Chinese engineer proposes a line to Seattle. In October 2025, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund offered a “Putin-Trump tunnel” for under $8 billion, and in June 2026 signs a design agreement for it. The story runs for a day and then goes away.
What the stories never say is that one side has been building toward the strait for forty years and the other has barely done anything. Russia began the Amur–Yakutsk Mainline in 1985, ran freight to the Lena in 2014 and passengers in 2019, and is continuing to push forward. But on the other side, the Alaska Railroad reached Fairbanks in 1923 and has been stuck there ever since. The tunnel is the last fifty-six miles of a twenty-five-hundred-mile railway, and the American side of it is empty.
What is the Bering Strait Tunnel?
A bored rail tunnel of roughly 60 miles from Russia’s Chukotka coast at Uelen to Wales, Alaska, passing under both Diomede Islands. The water is nowhere deeper than a hundred and sixty-five feet; for comparison, the Channel Tunnel (or Chunnel) is half that length and the Seikan tunnel in Japan runs twice as deep.
On the Russian side, about 1,250 miles of new railway from the Lena to the strait by way of Magadan must be built, extending a line Russian Railways has already built to Yakutsk. New construction on the American side will include about 600 miles of track from Wales to Fairbanks, and the Alaska-to-Alberta line south to the Canadian network at Fort McMurray, from which the existing railways can reach Chicago, Duluth and the Gulf.
The cost claims run from $65 billion for the whole corridor to under $8 billion for the tunnel alone. But the tunnel should not be thought of as a cost, but as the one place on earth where the railways of the Americas and the railways of Eurasia can meet. Join them and a freight car loaded in Chicago can be unloaded in Beijing, Moscow or Berlin without touching a ship. And unlike ocean transport from point A to point B, access to the rail network means value can be added along the way. The economic shape of the entire corridor changes.Every railway that has gone into empty northern regions has filled them. The Alaska Railroad turned Anchorage from a campsite into a city.
The Trans-Siberian moved millions of families east of the Ural Mountains. Six hundred miles of new track is six hundred miles of new towns, mines and ports in an area that has none, and the same on the Russian side from the Lena to the coast. And the ground at both ends is full of what our nation buys abroad: graphite and copper north of Nome and in the Ambler district, copper and gold across the strait in Chukotka. It’s all there, but none of it has a way out.
In April of 2007, the Russian Academy of Sciences sponsored a conference in Moscow on the topic. It was addressed by former Alaska governor Walter Hickel, and former American presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche submitted a paper for the occasion.
And it is American work. The rail will come from Pueblo and Columbia City, the locomotives from Erie and Muncie, and the new lines will be first steps in expanding rail electrification across the continental grid. It is also an example of tripartite cooperation: an infrastructure corridor that three governments could build and own together, as the Alaska–Siberia air route was for three years in the 1940s.
What President Sare Will Do
Our campaign’s rail program calls for 42,000 miles of electrified high-speed track in the United States. The Bering Strait and Alaska-Canada rail connector are our continental priority as the link to Eurasia, funded by a new Bank of the United States established to serve the general welfare not only of our nation, but of humanity. Diane Sare will do it in this order:
On the first day, fill the empty chair. In June 2026, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund signed an agreement with an engineering company to design the tunnel, and its head, Kirill Dmitriev, said it was signed “not with American officials.” President Sare will give the American answer. She will direct her Secretaries of State and Transportation to propose a Bering Strait treaty to Russia and Canada: one corridor, three governments. It would be built the way the St. Lawrence Seaway was built by treaty with Canada and opened in five years, and the way the Alaska Highway was built by agreement with Canada in a single season in 1942.
In the first year, pay for the study. In 2007 a two-year feasibility study of the whole corridor was priced at $120 million. Nineteen years have passed without anybody paying for it, so every cost figure is a rough estimate. President Sare will commission the study with Russia and Canada, and publish the results.
In the first budget, build the American half. The Bank of the United States will fund four things. Rails on the Port MacKenzie embankment, 32 miles of finished railbed that has had no track since 2015. The three remaining phases of the Northern Rail Extension to Delta Junction, where the Tanana River bridge was finished in 2014 and nothing was built on either side of it. A federal railway from Fairbanks to Wales, the Alaska Railroad was federally owned from 1914 to 1985. And the Alaska-to-Alberta line, taken over under a federal charter before its presidential permit runs out in 2030.
Build it with Russia and China. Russia’s side is under construction. China’s railways already connect to the Trans-Siberian. The treaty would bring joint access to the corridor. The line exists to carry freight between Chicago, Yakutsk and Beijing, starting with the Far Eastern cargo Russia is now shipping on the Northern Sea Route.
The rest of this page is the history: the Czar’s yes in 1906 and no in 1907, what got built, what stopped, and which headlines were wrong.

